![]() The New Location is an outlandish choice, an insult to the Lady and to Schenectady. The site became a pilgrimage site for local Catholics. ![]() (see our prior posting with more photos and discussion of the Mayor’s Choice, and this link to pdf file of heavily-redacted email, which is the City’s response to my FOIL request for documents relating to the choice of location for Lady Liberty ). Sceptics derided the absurdity of mistaking a salt stain for Mary, Mother of God. Later it became a target for various acts of vandalism. And the City of Chicago, its mayor and its Department of Streets and Sanitation demonstrated their usual preference. Original article on Live Science.Film/TV credits: “Easy,” “Shameless,” “Chicago Fire,” “Mob Doctor,” “Boss,” “Chicago Code,” “Approach Alone,” “Rooftop Wars,” “Arc of a Bird,” “Were the World Mine,” “Chicago Overcoat,” “First and Only Lesson,” “Eric’s Haircut,” “Dogwalker,” “Rogers Park,” “Olympia: Manual on how to live your life,” “Signature Move,” “En Algun Lugar,” “Princess Cyd,” “Single File,” “Teacher,” “Hala. In other words, the researchers wrote, people's expectations may have led their brains to find fuzzy patterns that looked face-like, creating a false impression.įollow Stephanie Pappas on Twitter and Google+. It also suggests that the region doesn't just activate in response to actual faces it also appears to activate in response to people's belief that they have seen a face. The finding that the FFA is involved specifically in face pareidolia fits with previous studies, the researchers wrote. A birdwatcher, for example, might use the FFA to tell the difference between a sparrow and a wren. This region has long been known to be involved in the recognition of faces, though recent research suggests that it helps people identify the differences between any objects of expertise. They found those differences in the fusiform face area (FFA), a small region on the side of the brain, behind the ear. The participants reported seeing faces 34 percent of the time and letters 38 percent of the time, despite there being none in the images they saw.īecause the researchers asked participants about letters as well as faces, they were able to tease out differences in brain activity associated with mistaken identification of a letter and those associated with mistaken identification of faces. ![]() The results revealed that priming people to look for identifiable objects in random patterns is bound to create a few hits. The men were again asked to press a button to indicate whether they saw a face or letter in the pattern. This time, however, all of the images were secretly just visual noise. ![]() ![]() The men were asked to push one handheld button if they saw a face (or letter) and another if they could not.Īfter this initial test, the men saw another series of images and were told half contained faces (or letters). The face and letter experiments were done separately, a week apart for each participant, but the set-up was the same. The final image was pure black-and-white, splotchy noise. Two others showed letters, again with one easy to see and one difficult to spot. Two images showed male faces, one easy to discern and the other camouflaged. The researchers first asked the men to look at a series of images, all of which were obscured with the kind of static-y visual "noise" you might see on a television with a bad cable connection. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |